Friday, March 17, 2017

9-2: Medical Malpractice: Is My Treatment Really Safe?

            What is the first thing that comes across someone’s mind when they walk into a doctor’s office? Chances are, it is probably something along the lines of, “I wonder if I’m contagious?” or “I hope it’s not broken!” Most of our society puts their trust into medical professionals in order to treat sickness and disease; however, there is a small percentage of the population that takes extreme caution when seeking treatment, or even avoids treatment altogether. Medical malpractice is defined by Medical News Today as, “. . . professional negligence by a health care professional or provider in which treatment provided was substandard, and caused harm, injury or death to a patient.” (Nordqvist) When medical malpractice cases are shown in the media, it can cause patients, as well as the general public, to be more hesitant about trusting professionals with their healthcare. Although medical malpractice is not an extremely common occurrence, it is still a valid cause for many people to become apprehensive about medical professionals and treatments.
One malpractice case that received national attention was the Paul Lozano case from the late 1980’s. In this case, Paul Lozano, who received treatment from Dr. Bean Bayog of Harvard psychology, committed suicide following a five-year treatment for depression and sexual abuse. Lozano began treatment with Dr. Bean-Bayog in 1986 because he was suffering from depression. She assessed that Lozano had been sexually abused by his mother as a child and, although there was no evidence to prove her claim, concluded that the best option for treatment would be a method called Schema Therapy Limited Reparenting, a highly controversial form of therapy used to treat patients who were neglected or abused when they were younger. During the treatment period, Bean-Bayog reduced Lozano to “the emotional age of 3” in order to give him what his mother apparently never had. (Carpenter) In the process of the treatment, Bean Bayog became attracted to Lozano and had sexual relations with him as a part of his “treatment.” The treatment spanned a five-year period and once it had concluded, Lozano committed suicide.
            There are many speculations as to what might have happened and since Dr. Bean-Bayog never agreed to an interview and a lot of what we know about this case is based on her paperwork and the notes she took while she was working with Lozano. These documents were made public during the trial. After Lozano’s death, his family found notes from Dr. Bean-Bayog “addressed to "the boy" from "Mom."” (Carpenter) demonstrating how strange Dr. Bean-Bayog’s treatment was. There were also what appeared to be journal entries written by Dr. Bean-Bayog that detailed sexual relations between the doctor and her patient as part of Lozano’s “treatment.” To avoid a lengthy trial, Dr. Bean-Bayog agreed to a settlement and forfeited her license.
One reason that Lozano may have chosen to end his life is the fact that he might have still been at a three-year-old emotional state. A child can suffer separation anxiety when they are removed from the presence of their caregiver and Lozano may have had a similar reaction when treatment with Dr. Bean-Bayog was discontinued. It is speculated that the reason that Bean-Bayog became so invested with her patient in the first place was because she had not been able to have children. She had suffered nine miscarriages and saw Lozano as her chance at raising a child. “Sadly, one of the reasons she allegedly gave him for terminating therapy was that she had decided to adopt a baby of her own.” (Carpenter) He may have felt like he was being “replaced,” not realizing that the doctor was not actually his biological parent.
The Lozano case may be a cause of anxiety for others seeking treatment for sexual abuse because it shows that doctors and therapists are human, and therefore susceptible to temptations. The New York Times describes this situation in their article “Therapy or Seduction?” They say: “What safeguards, if any, exist to protect patients from a doctor's human frailty? Even by psychiatry's own vague standards, Ms. McNamara says, Dr. Bean-Bayog should have consulted her peers before undertaking such an unusual treatment.” (Carpenter) This case may also cause anxiety in young or expecting mothers who suffer from postpartum depression. As defined by The National Institute of Mental health, “Postpartum depression is a mood disorder that can affect women after childbirth.” (NIMH) Women with postpartum depression tend to, “worry or feel overly anxious” after their baby is born and when someone suffering from postpartum depression hears about the Paul Lozano case, they may become overly obsessed with providing for their child because Lozano was “deprived” as a child. Some mothers may feel like they are also inadequate mothers. Even though the Lozano case is a “one in a million” type of situation, it was so heavily publicized that it instilled worry into many different groups of people.
Another widely known malpractice incident is the John/Joan case: a classic nature versus nurture scenario. In 1966, Bruce Reimer suffered a failed circumcision operation as a toddler and was raised as “Brenda” Reimer. This was a part of an experiment conducted by Dr. John Money from John Hopkins University, who wanted to prove that gender is only controlled by social and environmental values, not by biological makeup. The New York Times reports that, “His sexual reassignment was then widely reported as a success and proof that children are not by nature feminine or masculine but through nurture are socialized to become girls or boys.” (The Associated Press) However, time eventually proved this statement inaccurate as Brenda became increasingly different from the other children at school. After many years of living as a girl, Brenda’s parents finally told her the truth of her gender identity. At this point, Brenda changed her name to David and underwent a series of operations to restore his masculinity. David then lived as a man for twenty years, eventually committing suicide in 2004 at the age of 38. Dr. Money’s experiment, as described by The Los Angeles Times, “was a disaster for Reimer that created psychological scars he ultimately could not overcome.”  
When this case first became public, it was a heavy debate that caused a lot of political backlash. It was hard for people to believe that a medical professional had conducted such a potentially controversial and unethical experiment. It also proved to be upsetting to anyone who was dealing with their gender identity. Because the results of Dr. Money’s experiment proved that “biological factors can override gender role socialization.” someone struggling with their gender identity may become confused. When someone is constantly being told that they are one thing, but they feel like they are something totally different, it can be confusing and emotionally upsetting.
Another reason why the John/Joan case may cause people to become alarmed is the failed circumcision operation. The doctors had performed the procedure many times, but used an unconventional method on Bruce that resulted in serious damage to his body. Bruce’s experience proves that even when a doctor has performed a surgery hundreds of times, things can still go wrong. This idea causes anyone requiring surgery to become less enthusiastic about putting their body into someone else’s hands for even just a short period of time. There are nearly 160,000 deaths every year, caused by medical malpractice, definitely not a small number, especially to someone already having worries about an operation.
In the end, it all comes down to costs and consequences: Is it worth getting professional help when the consequences may be detrimental? In some cases the answer is yes, but some cases it may be no. For example: someone suffering from cancer is likely to get treatment because the risk of medical negligence is less important than treating this deadly illness. On the other hand, it isn’t necessary to consult a doctor about every little runny nose. It is important to thoroughly research the treatment, the doctor providing the treatment, and the risks involved with the treatment. Increased knowledge may help ease worries, and help patients live a healthy, stress free life.



Works Cited

"Anxiety Disorders and Anxiety Attacks."HelpGuide: Trusted Guide to Mental Health.
N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Carpenter, Teresa. "The New York Times."The New York Times. N.p., 10 Apr. 1994.
Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

The Associated Press. "David Reimer, 38, Subject of the John/Joan Case."The New
York Times. N.p., 12 May 2004. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Gammill, Marion B. "Bean-Bayog Case Ends After 6 Years."The Harvard Crimson. N.p.,
18 Dec. 1992. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Grison, Sarah, Todd F. Heatherton, and Michael S. Gazzaniga.Psychology In Your
Life. 2nd ed. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2017. Print.

Grossman, Ron. "When A Psychiatrist Carries Treatment Too Far."Chicago Tribune.
N.p., 16 Mar. 1994. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Nordqvist, Christian. "Medical News today."Medical News Today. N.p., 17 Sept. 2014.
Web. 17 Mar. 2017.


"Postpartum Depression."National Institute of Mental Health. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Mar.
2017.

"Schema Therapy Limited Reparenting."Cognitive Behavior Therapy Center. N.p., n.d.
Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Schillo, Keith K. "Nature or Nurture: The Case of the Boy Who Became a
Girl."Sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu. National Center for Case Study Teaching In
Science, n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.

Woo, Elaine. "David Reimer, 38: After Botched Surgery, He Was Raised as a Girl in
Gender Experiment."LA Times. N.p., 13 May 2004. Web. 17 Mar. 2017.


No comments:

Post a Comment